Don't Let the Details Distract You From the Big Picture
Before starting my PhD program, I worked as a research assistant for my future advisor, Dr. Eric Bogatin.
I vividly remember one of our weekly meetings. I had discovered something intriguing in an experiment. The results looked promising, so I spent additional time exploring the findings. I was excited to show Eric both the original results and the extra work I had done.
I Thought I Was Making Progress. Until the Direction Changed.
During our meeting, I presented my findings.
Eric looked at the results, rested his hand on his bearded chin, and paused.
“Tim, this result looks great! But it's taking us toward a different conclusion than we originally planned.”
I was shocked. Twice.
First, I realized that much of the extra work I had done might no longer be useful. All that effort, and now we needed to change direction?
But the second surprise was more profound.
Eric seemed completely comfortable with the change. There was no frustration about our original plan being wrong. He simply recognized what the results were telling us and was ready to adjust.
Keep the Big Picture in View
On the bus back from the lab to campus, I kept thinking about how to avoid wasting effort again.
I had become so intoxicated by the positive finding that I kept digging deeper. Each additional experiment felt like progress. Somewhere along the way, I had lost sight of why we were doing the experiment in the first place.
Eric was looking at the bigger picture. While I focused on what the results showed, he was asking what they meant for the project. That distinction stayed with me.
An interesting result doesn't automatically make it an important result. Before investing more time in the details, I needed to ask the Eric question:
So what?
What did we actually learn? How did it change our understanding of the problem? And why did it matter?
I eventually realized that the same questions apply when developing technical presentations. Creating slides, generating data, and building charts can be enjoyable and feel productive. But it's important to keep the bigger picture—and the presentation's main message—in view.
Connect Your Findings to the Audience's Challenge
I used to think my PhD thesis defense would involve the hardest questions I'd ever have to answer. But Eric's simple “So what?” turned out to be far more challenging.
Those two words carry several questions:
- Who is your audience?
- Why should they care about your findings?
- How can your results help them?
For example, imagine I analyzed the cross-sectional geometry of printed circuit board traces from a particular board fabricator. I discovered that inner-layer traces had less width variation than outer-layer traces.
I could spend hours documenting the measurement technique, number of samples, and detailed results. I'd have slides full of data and charts explaining what I found and how I found it.
That feels productive because I'm creating something tangible. But without a clear direction, I might spend hours developing details that don't serve the main objective.
And the “so what?” would remain unanswered.
The interesting part isn't simply how I measured the traces. It's what the findings could mean for the fabricator's customers.
For PCB designers using this fabricator, the findings suggest that routing signals on inner layers might help improve impedance consistency.
Instead of immediately filling slides with charts, I would first sketch an outline around that possible implication:
How Layer Selection Could Improve Impedance Control with Fabricator X
- Why consistent impedance matters
- Inner-layer traces showed less width variation
- What this could mean for layer selection
- Measurement evidence and limitations
Starting with a rough outline helps me see the whole picture before committing to the details. And because the outline is still rough, I can adjust it as new insights emerge.
Once I understand what matters to my audience, I can build the presentation around that message instead of letting the details distract me.
Sketch the Big Picture Before Perfecting the Details
Looking back on my project with Eric, I realized that my approach was like trying to draw a perfect river before sketching the canyon and the surrounding landscape.
I was so focused on getting one detail right that I hadn't considered how it fit into the overall composition.
The same thing happens when creating technical presentations. It's tempting to start producing detailed charts, polishing slides, and explaining every interesting finding before establishing the main message.
But a drawing starts with a rough sketch for a reason.
By first identifying the “so what?” and sketching the overall structure, I can explore different ideas without becoming overly committed to any one direction.
If a new finding changes my understanding, I can adjust the outline, rearrange sections, or investigate a different possibility.
That's much easier than rebuilding a presentation after spending hours perfecting individual slides.
The goal isn't to avoid details. It's to make sure the details serve the bigger picture.
Try It Yourself: Ask “So What?”
The next time you're working on a project or presentation, ask yourself the harder-than-thesis-defense question:
SO WHAT?
Before spending hours perfecting the position of a text box on a slide, step back and identify the message you're trying to communicate.
The same principle applies beyond presentations.
- Software developers: What customer problem will this feature solve?
- Engineers and researchers: What decision will these results help someone make?
- Marketing professionals: What is the one message I want my audience to remember?
Before diving deeper into the details, try writing down your answer to “so what?” in one sentence. Then ask yourself: Are the details supporting that message, or distracting you from it?
The next time you get lost in the details, remember to look at the bigger picture.
Once you've identified your presentation's message, remember to use the SPARK Framework to make it more engaging!
Comments ()